Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 18:15:46 +0000
Has AMP Futures been rejected from the
View Count: 1491
| [2022-01-09 16:03:07] |
| User798755 - Posts: 9 |
|
I have seen yesterday the AMP Futures as one of the Data&Service providers that qualified for the "Easy Solution to CME Funded Trading Account Requirements". Today I can see only Stage 5. 1. What happend that AMP is no longer recognized provider? 2. Or maybe it is matter of fees and I can still use AMP (i mean open there trading account funded with 100$) in order to benefit from the lower fees on CME Real Time futures data? if asnwer to question 2 is "NOT" - than which Datafeed from Stage 5 i should use (S5 trader, Continuum, CQG, Rhitnmic, TTnet, DTN IQ Feed or any other) to be able to use: - real time futures data in Sierra Charts and - on trade simulation mode Thanks |
| [2022-01-09 17:17:26] |
| |
|
You can use any broker, that supports the Teton Order Routing Service, Interactive Brokers, CQG, Rithmic systems to meet the CME funded trading account requirement to take advantage of the lower cost CME nonprofessional fees. AMP is included as well. The reason we removed AMP from that list, is because they do not support Teton and we do not want to have more users being put on CQG. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2022-01-09 20:49:38
|
| [2022-01-09 20:24:48] |
| User798755 - Posts: 9 |
|
If that is the case and I can still use AMP and they can put me on CQG so what is the real reason? You removed them from one list (creating some confisuion) but you still accept them in principle? You tell me I can use any broker including those supporting CQG ... but in next sentence you say you do not want to have more users being put on CQG? How should I than make a choice if you send contradictory answers or plase explain if I do not understand? This is my first experience with futures trading. It is easy for me to use AMP therefore it is important for me... but i do not want to open funded trading account and extend the Sierra charts package for another 3 months just to know later that something is wrong and you then tell me ... you do not want CQG users. Please advise Thanks |
| [2022-01-09 20:34:04] |
| |
|
We gave the real reason. No secret. Go ahead and set up your account with AMP and they can set you up on CQG and you can use that to authorize the real time CME data. That will be fine. And hopefully before we raise the price for using CQG, AMP will support the Teton order routing service. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2022-01-09 20:55:00] |
| User798755 - Posts: 9 |
|
Hi again, just to update my previous question please confirm as the info on your pages is sometimes not fully clear. If I want to have the reduced fee for futures on real time basis I need to either: a/ open funded trading account at AMP presumably on CQG and extend the Sierra chart package (for whatever period I wish) with Denali Data Feed (at 10$) - and this Denali Data feed already includes the fee for futures real time (Full CME Group (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX) for nonprofessional Trading accounts (at 3,5$) or I need to pay additionally the fee of 3,5$ on the top of the S/C package and Denali Data feed or b/ open funded trading account at AMP presumably on CQG, and pay them for the real time data in which case I do not need Denali Data Feed and potentially additional 3,5$ fee? I think this was an option still available yesterday but as I read your pages on easy solution I understood this is no more applicable solution today. Thank you Regards |
| [2022-01-10 16:47:01] |
| John - SC Support - Posts: 38386 |
|
You really need to do option a/ and you will need to pay the $3.50 exchange fee in addition to your Sierra Chart Usage cost. Option b/ would get you the CQG data, but they do not have historical data for expired contracts and you would only be able to get the data when connected to CQG. And you would still need to pay the $3.50 fee for the exchange. With Option a/ you can get the real-time data at all times, regardless of what service you are connected to, and we have historical data back to 2011 and earlier in some cases. For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2022-01-10 17:40:20] |
| User798755 - Posts: 9 |
|
Thank you very much, I appreciate all your comments.
|
| [2022-01-14 15:39:45] |
| |
|
We have given your account a new trial.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2022-01-14 16:47:49] |
| User798755 - Posts: 9 |
|
Very much appreciate, thank you.
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: