Support Board
Date/Time: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 01:46:14 +0000
Volume by Price Study - Questions & Feature Requests
View Count: 1252
[2015-12-17 01:29:00] |
Yoda - Posts: 106 |
The Name & Value Label options on the Peaks & Valleys (P&V) (SG18) & Point of Control (POC) (SG2) in the Volume by Price Study appear to be mistakenly linked: - In the P&V Label option, I can only show or hide Value Labels, the other options below the Label check boxes do not appear to affect the P&V Name or where the values appear. - However, if I have the Value Label checked in the POC area and I change the Horizontal Align, it controls the P&V values (as long as the P&V Value Label box is checked). In other words, it appears that the POC and P&V Labels are mistakenly tied together. Would it be possible to split these two so we have separate control of each? - Also, no matter what I do, I cannot seem to have SC show the P&V Name Labels. How can I show the P&V Name Labels? While we are on the topic of the Volume by Price study, I was wondering if it is possible to hide the P&V lines and only show the labels? If not, may I ask that this be considered for a future update? Finally, is it possible to show the dates that Extended Points of Control started from (Specifically the ones that have not yet intersected with future price) ? The issue I am having is that I have a number of nVPOCs on my chart but it's not clear which date they relate to. Since some of these go back a long way, it's a lot of work to try to figure out what date they originated. It would be really great if SC provided the option of a date label for each nVPOC. Thank you, Richard |
[2015-12-18 14:03:42] |
Yoda - Posts: 106 |
Dear Support, may I ask that you please reply to my post above.
|
[2015-12-18 18:25:21] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
There is a lot here. We need time to review this. Also for additional development requests, those would be at an additional cost if they are not commonly requested. We will require that you either have a direct account: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/doc_DirectAccount.html Or separate payment for them. Once we look these over we can give you an idea as to the cost. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2015-12-27 08:56:42] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
- However, if I have the Value Label checked in the POC area and I change the Horizontal Align, it controls the P&V values (as long as the P&V Value Label box is checked). In other words, it appears that the POC and P&V Labels are mistakenly tied together. Would it be possible to split these two so we have separate control of each? Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2015-12-27 09:06:35] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
Peaks and Valleys lines do not support the Name label. While we are on the topic of the Volume by Price study, I was wondering if it is possible to hide the P&V lines and only show the labels? If not, may I ask that this be considered for a future update?
These can be done. We are not sure exactly as to the amount of time involved in the second one. Probably not too hard but not very simple either. As a general rule we will require you to have a direct paid account for us to undertake this development but we see no reason why there would be any additional cost beyond committing to 12 months of usage time for the second item.
Finally, is it possible to show the dates that Extended Points of Control started from (Specifically the ones that have not yet intersected with future price) ? The issue I am having is that I have a number of nVPOCs on my chart but it's not clear which date they relate to. Since some of these go back a long way, it's a lot of work to try to figure out what date they originated. It would be really great if SC provided the option of a date label for each nVPOC. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2015-12-30 15:30:20] |
Yoda - Posts: 106 |
Thank you Support. I'm in the process of determining whether SC has everything that I require. If I determine that it will work, I will commit to the 12 months of usage at that time.
|
[2016-02-28 22:01:30] |
User17477 - Posts: 65 |
I would also like to see this functionality please SC support. Many thanks as always
|
[2016-02-29 14:52:04] |
User15952 - Posts: 132 |
+1000
|
[2016-03-07 20:44:52] |
User91026 - Posts: 16 |
This is a great suggestion and I, and i am sure many others, would be extremely grateful if SC support would consider adding this functionality.
|
[2016-03-07 21:32:28] |
GiantAvocado - Posts: 67 |
Totally agree with the users here; great additions if you would sometime implement. Thx... GiantAvocado |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: