Support Board
Date/Time: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 06:58:04 +0000
Post From: TimeSession Help Denali Server Node Request
| [2025-03-30 02:21:10] |
| Bond - Posts: 7 |
|
Except for the problem with the New Zealand node, other problems were well supported and solved. The latency of the ds40.sierra charts server is very large, even higher than the ds32.sierracharts Ping latency，The average ds40 is above 300ms, and even up to 800ms during peak hours. I used the node monitoring test provided by the operator in 300 locations in China and monitored it continuously for one day. The Ping delay in China has never been lower than 320ms! I also installed SC on local PCs in Shanghai and Beijing for testing. The latency of ds40 is higher than that of ds32. During peak hours, ds32 will experience lag and data loss, but at least it is normal outside of peak hours. I understand that long geographical distance will cause high latency to the server, and there are many routing nodes passed through. ds32 Ping is 220-230ms, which is within the normal range! The ds40 server is only 9,000 kilometers away from us, so why is the latency 50% higher than that of ds32? ds32 is a full 14,000 km away！ |
 ds40 300 regional node tests.jpg / V - Attached On 2025-03-30 02:16:06 UTC - Size: 58.63 KB - 13 views ds40 ping.jpg / V - Attached On 2025-03-30 02:16:11 UTC - Size: 118.9 KB - 10 views server settings.png / V - Attached On 2025-03-30 02:16:19 UTC - Size: 450.65 KB - 13 views |