Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:39:29 +0000
Post From: Time Range Highlight
| [2014-06-05 09:18:18] |
| User79347 - Posts: 23 |
|
Hello! THANK YOU VERY MUCH! It's working! Sorry, i am understand, it's not my business, but i wish to say something. For a years, i use same chart type as Reversal Bar. I was very surprized, that is already realised in some of platforms ;) With Line-On-Close mode and colorisation by sessions it's almost my "own" chart. But not exactly same. If i am understand right, the difference is in absenting of "close" at my chart. I have only H and L, which forming as extremum from initial tick rows... For small pip sizes, the differences is not too big, but it's increasing with increasing of pips size. For 10 pips size, extremums from "line on close" and my chart has a differences for a several pips already. Of course my type of chart do not losing extremums, this is exactly right values, but line-on-close - losing, becouse it's closes, but not low or high. http://enten.netne.net/comparing.png By link - the same periods of your chart and my own chart with 3 pips resolution for today, with same datafeed CTS4 (i use sierrachart tick row for drawing my own chart - the sources is 100% same), but my chart is more.. volatile, more detalised with same numbers of points at chart. Just becouse of close differential can be 1 pips, and real movements was 2-3 pips, and as i said - the difference (losting) is increasing by increasing size of reversal move. Sorry for my opinion... i use this "own" chart from 2001 year...May be this will be interesting for you... Just imagine, Point and Figure is losing information by cell sizes, but with this chart - we see ALL exactly values of prices, but without contr sizes (returning) less then pips sizes... Sorry again for long letter. Sierra - the best. i remember you from may be ... 2003 year Good luck! thisletterforme |at| gmail.com Date Time Of Last Edit: 2014-06-05 09:21:13
|