Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 09:42:26 +0000
Post From: Subgraph memory question
| [2016-11-10 05:48:23] |
| enemyspy - Posts: 306 |
|
Does the the sc.subgraph matrix take up the same amount of memory regardless of how many columns are referenced and unused? for instance if I were to reference all 60 columns but not populate them with result - leave them all empty. Would it be taking up the same amount of space as if they were left un-referenced? I am pretty sure If it is already there whether it is referenced does not impact memory use? EDIT: Therefore, Would it be wasteful to have a Subgraph that is 99% NULL values, or is every subgraph in sc.subgraph allocated based on the chart size ahead of time anyway? Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-11-10 06:01:37
|