Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 21:13:45 +0000
High Pullback Ask/Bid Vol Diff in Number Bar Calculated Values is false in recent builds
View Count: 1893
| [2017-09-02 16:47:21] |
| gomifromparis - Posts: 244 |
|
It was OK in 1587, wrong in 1605, I think also in 1590. The Low Pullback Ask/Bid Vol Diff is OK. |
 sierrabadcot.png / V - Attached On 2017-09-02 16:44:04 UTC - Size: 75.22 KB - 434 views sierragoodcot2.png / V - Attached On 2017-09-02 16:46:20 UTC - Size: 48.36 KB - 404 views |
| [2017-09-02 20:39:44] |
| |
|
We will check on this. Not sure why there would be a problem.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-09-05 16:32:17] |
| |
|
We have spent some time on this and we realize the way that you are presenting this is very unclear. It looks as though you are comparing the High Pullback Ask volume Bid volume difference, to your own study. How do you know your own study is correct? We see no reason why there would be any problem with these calculations in Sierra Chart especially being you are not seeing any issue with the low pullback calculation which follows the same method as the high pullback other than resetting on a low rather than a high. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-09-05 16:32:52
|
| [2017-09-05 16:49:23] |
| gomifromparis - Posts: 244 |
|
I posted the same chart, from the exact same bars, from SC1587 and SC1605 The Low Pullback numbers match between the 2 versions, not the High Pullback. So something did happen on the High Pullback. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-09-05 16:49:59
|
| [2017-09-05 16:59:40] |
| |
|
What time zone is that chart set to? And is the data file using tick by tick data? Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-09-05 17:08:24] |
| gomifromparis - Posts: 244 |
|
Paris Time (GMT+2) Yes it's one tick. |
| [2017-09-05 18:01:59] |
| gomifromparis - Posts: 244 |
|
Rithmic data. By the way my NinjaTrader8 version using a manual tick by tick calculation matches the SC1587 numbers. |
| [2017-09-06 00:24:12] |
| |
|
We found the problem and fixed it.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: