Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:37:01 +0000
[User Discussion] - Study does not recalc
View Count: 1069
| [2014-09-04 21:35:23] |
| joshtrader - Posts: 488 |
|
I am attaching a chartbook I created from scratch today. If you will notice chart #26 is linked to #27, #28, #29, and #30. When I change bar period on chart #26, they all change, as expected. However, the studies associated with them do not recalc. If I click "reload and recalculate" on #27-#30 the data recalculates as expected. So in other words, a manual recalculation is necessary whereas an automatic one should be happening, as far as I can tell.
Date Time Of Last Edit: 2014-09-04 21:35:56
|
Private File |
| [2014-09-04 22:46:30] |
| |
|
We are checking on this now.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2014-09-05 04:02:22] |
| |
|
We started to look at the Chartbook. It contains a large number of charts. It is a struggle to work with under a debugger. We need a Chartbook only containing the charts that are mentioned. And are the studies you referred to, Sierra Chart built-in studies? Really with what you are describing, this sounds like an impossible condition and we can see no reason why it would happen. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2014-09-05 15:26:30] |
| joshtrader - Posts: 488 |
|
Attached a slimmer version. So when you open, you will see that #26 is not correct. So go to #27, 28, 29, and 30 and "reload and recalc" and you will see 26 look as it should. For another bug I just found, to avoid reporting it separately: I've left two charts open (two 1min @ES#C) in this chartbook with one of them showing the main price chart in region 2. If you use a global crosshairs on the other, you will notice that it shows it in region 1, instead of region 2, where the price bars are. |
Private File |
| [2014-09-06 02:53:43] |
| |
|
We had a look at the set up, this is really quite advanced and we will not get involved with analyzing it. We would only get involved in analyzing this for an extra charge. Although we do not have the time or the interest to get involved in this even for a charge. There is some complex dependency issue going on. It is impossible for there to be any problem with the basic calculation functionality but this goes way beyond that. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2014-09-07 09:52:24
|
| [2014-09-06 02:57:20] |
| |
|
Have a look at this section here to see if it helps: http://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/doc_ChartStudies.html#StudyCalculationPrecedence Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2014-09-08 00:26:54] |
| joshtrader - Posts: 488 |
|
Ok, so I have coded my own version of what I was trying to accomplish in order to get the desired result. However, I have a question: if I set two charts to link based on Bar Period and Session Time, in the past when I changed the # of days to load, they would all change to match that. In the current version it seems that this is no longer the case. Is this expected behavior? And if so and it's a new behavior, is there a way in ACSIL to change the number of days loaded on one chart to match another? Date Time Of Last Edit: 2014-09-08 00:27:19
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: