Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 03:54:31 +0000
Difference in Numbers Bars output between two systems
View Count: 528
| [2022-07-10 18:45:19] |
| User606846 - Posts: 2 |
|
I am comparing the output of a Numbers Bars study with a friend of mine, and our output looks markedly different. We both are on Denali CME and Teton, both set to intraday data storage at 1 tick. The only difference I can see is that he has MBO and I do not. I don't know if that impacts the numbers bars study or not. The attached examples are from 7/8. Look at the bars at 8:43:49. His view does not have the long tail of zeros and the next block with five matched-volume pairs. Note that I had to add his as an image as I do not have access to his SC instance. https://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?Image=1657478603882.png Date Time Of Last Edit: 2022-07-10 18:47:53
|
 No-zero-tail.png / V - Attached On 2022-07-10 18:44:20 UTC - Size: 424.5 KB - 119 views |
| [2022-07-11 08:14:29] |
| |
|
There must be some reason for the difference. Are you sure that each instance of Sierra Chart is set to a tick by tick data configuration? Set Sierra Chart to a Tick by Tick Data Configuration. Follow the instructions here to do this: Tick by Tick Data Configuration Also refer to: Working With Charts: Resolving Differences of Chart Bars Between Charts Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: