Home >> Support Board

Support Board

Date/Time: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 22:23:27 +0000

How to Post a Message for Support

Teton order routing features and comparision to TT/SC routing

View Count: 609

[2022-01-06 16:56:08] #1 [Go To First Post]
nosast - Posts: 312
I'm currently thinking about switching from TT/SC orderrouting to Teton and have a few questions to SC guys: - In the documentation it states, that auto liquididtation after daily loss limit hit will be out in December? Is this already live? - Is there a user controllable Daily loss limit and a Broker controlled one? I need both for daily risk management and emergency/desaster loss limit fixed by my broker? - You did a nice comparision for latency Teton vs. CQG. Could you also do this for Teton vs. TT/SC? Would be very interesting to see the results. Thanks in advance Norman

[2022-01-06 17:55:45] #2 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
- In the documentation it states, that auto liquididtation after daily loss limit hit will be out in December? Is this already live? Not yet. But will be gradually released over the next couple of weeks. Although the use of this will require approval from clearing firms and we can make no assurances as to what they will do. It will first be available with Stage 5. - Is there a user controllable Daily loss limit and a Broker controlled one? I need both for daily risk management and emergency/desaster loss limit fixed by my broker? Yes there is a broker controlled one and a user controllable one will come later on. We will try to get to that before March/April. - You did a nice comparision for latency Teton vs. CQG. Could you also do this for Teton vs. TT/SC? Would be very interesting to see the results. For TT order routing, the one way time is about 1000 µs. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2022-01-06 17:56:24

[2022-01-06 18:59:54] #3 [Go To First Post]
nosast - Posts: 312
Thanks. So right now there is only the SC built-in Global PNL management working which needs to have SC online for sure. In case of internet or power outage this won't really help. Guess I will wait then a couple of weeks before switching. One way 1000 µs is pretty good but if I get that correct 600 µs is the round-trip time for Teton, right? So it would be TT/SC 2000 µs roundtrip VS Teton 600 µs roundtrip. Both excellent with Teton being outstandingly fast ;)

[2022-01-06 21:44:41] #4 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
Yes about 600 µs round-trip is correct. Can be lower, can be higher. It varies. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2022-01-06 21:44:49

To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: