Support Board
Date/Time: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 07:35:22 +0000
Denali tick feed vs. CQG feed
View Count: 1013
| [2021-03-08 16:22:53] |
| User716258 - Posts: 7 |
|
I have a couple feeds using two different charting platforms -- one with you, the other through a prop firm. I use 610 tick charts on both. Denali's feed is slower compared to CQG. CQG's move up and down constantly -- quite quick. Whereas Denali's does not. What ends up happening is that I see bars form differently. Is this "slowness" inherent to Denali? Or is there something I need to do on my end to configure SierraChart correctly? I've read all of the instructions in setting up Denali, and it's working. It just seems like Denali's feed "consolidates" tick data and doesn't actually send true tick data. Thanks! Love SC! |
| [2021-03-08 17:05:20] |
| |
|
No this definitely cannot be true: It just seems like Denali's feed "consolidates" tick data and doesn't actually send true tick data.
Refer to: Prices / Data Falling Behind: 4.2 - Chart Update Interval Too High Prices / Data Falling Behind: 4.12 - Sierra Chart Exchange Data Feeds Set Sierra Chart to a Tick by Tick Data Configuration. Follow the instructions here to do this: Tick by Tick Data Configuration And refer to: Number Of Trades, Volume or Range Bar Charts Do Not Match Setting or Are Not Accurate or Are Inconsistent Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-03-08 17:13:28
|
| [2021-03-08 17:25:26] |
| User716258 - Posts: 7 |
|
Awesome. It was the chart update interval. Thanks so much!
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: