Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 02:24:49 +0000
CQG FIX and SERVER SIDE bracket orders
View Count: 1036
| [2021-02-18 16:29:40] |
| Gary Number 2 - Posts: 131 |
|
I'm under the impression that CQG web API will not have server side held bracket orders (just as it has been), and correct me if I'm wrong in that. Next question is, will the CQG FIX that is to be completed in the next 7-14 days have SERVER SIDE held bracket orders? Thanks |
| [2021-02-18 16:33:37] |
| |
|
Yes your understanding is correct in both cases.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2021-03-04 11:26:38] |
| NotIll - Posts: 118 |
|
As it is now 14 days after the initial post, is the CQG FIX usuable with SC at this point and are the server side bracket orders to be used?
|
| [2021-03-04 14:02:13] |
| |
|
We are not going to be supporting CQG FIX. Server-side bracket orders are not supported with CQG. We are focusing on our own direct CME order routing at this time.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2021-03-05 06:20:37] |
| NotIll - Posts: 118 |
|
#4, and this will take months you said right?
|
| [2022-10-05 13:05:46] |
| Paulof - Posts: 5 |
|
Then the best thing to do is change to a broker that provides Teton, would you agree?
|
| [2022-10-05 13:29:35] |
| Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 18836 |
|
If you are with AMP you do not need to change brokers because they will be supporting Teton within a few weeks.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2022-10-05 14:31:35] |
| Paulof - Posts: 5 |
|
I understand, but those weeks could mean more lost money. Amp is clearly taking their time to take action and realise that their service is becoming obsolete, meaning they are not providing the best feed for their customers and that cost me money , that they don’t care about. Time for a change and a review. |
| [2022-10-05 19:02:18] |
| User13668 - Posts: 294 |
|
Re #7 This is encouraging. In previous posts in other threads you have recentley said you do not know when AMP will support Teton as AMP have not been in contact with SC. So I take it that based on the wording of #7, AMP are now in active dialogue with SC to deploy Teton - correct? Cheers |
| [2022-10-06 21:26:31] |
| Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 18836 |
|
From what we understand, AMP is very close to releasing support for Teton.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: