Support Board
Date/Time: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 17:01:24 +0000
Two installation, one much slower.
View Count: 545
| [2020-05-05 07:50:33] |
| User745789 - Posts: 356 |
|
I have two separate installations. - SC1 (v2086) for CQG exchanges that are not provided by the SC data feed. - SC2 (v2092) for testing SC CME delayed data, plans to go realtime with that soon. Both are running copies of same chart book. SC2 is significantly slower than SC1. Even clicking the study window OK button has a 2-3 second lag before the window disappears. SC2 is slower regardless of whether SC1 is running or not. Is SC2 slower due to the delayed data feed, or do I have a problem to troubleshoot before going live with Sierra data feed in the second installation? Date Time Of Last Edit: 2020-05-05 07:52:59
|
| [2020-05-05 07:53:53] |
| |
|
Is SC2 slower due to the delayed data feed, No. This is processed very very efficiently and has no impact.Refer to help topic 30: High CPU Usage | Inactive User Interface | Poor Performance | Long Time to Load Chart Data | Charts Reloading Often Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: