Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:08:08 +0000
[User Discussion] - CTS Advanced Low Cost Connection Model - Feedback
View Count: 690
| [2018-08-24 02:41:02] |
| User379884 - Posts: 45 |
|
Hi, I recently switched from CQG to the CTS Advanced Low Cost Connection Model. I am VERY pleased with it. - It is truly robust. - SC Datafeed is excellent. - The server side parent order offset adjust for child orders feature has paid for the service many times over in just one week. - Server side orders just work as they should. There is no concern in the back of my mind that orders will stuff up somehow. Although CQG was adequate the advanced CTS/SC package is far more robust, has better features, and server side orders behave as one would expect. Big thumbs up from me and one should look no further than this option if you use server side orders. Anyone else who has experiences with this is welcome to share... |
| [2018-08-24 18:46:35] |
| |
|
For reference here is the documentation: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/CTS_T4.php#SetupInstructionsForAdvancedLowCostConnectionModel Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: