Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 12:40:11 +0000
Study values omissions in regions 2 and lower
View Count: 1004
| [2017-08-17 20:58:15] |
| User11942 - Posts: 298 |
|
Hello SC team, is there a way to increase space for vertical scale? Study values in my charts often get omitted (please see right bottom corner of the attached screenshot and this is not the worst example). Thanks.
Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-08-17 21:07:13
|
Private File |
| [2017-08-17 21:25:28] |
| |
|
From what we can tell from that chart, you have the Volume study set to display in Chart Region 3 when it should be in region 2. This should be clear. Here is the documentation for working with charts: Working With Charts Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-08-17 23:05:54] |
| User11942 - Posts: 298 |
|
I'm afraid I couldn't find an answer by the link above. Do you see that the last digits in volume study scale are partially cut off? The current value is also partially cut off. Sometimes last digit can be almost totally cut off when I use studies different than the Volume study (specifically if the study has a negative value). I noticed this is also often the case when I switch symbols and bar period (however it might be unrealted). Decreasing font size won't help especially when there are many small chart windows in one chart book. And the Volume study is now in region 2 (although it doesn't really matter). In this particular case when I add Volume study, price scale space expands but not enough apparently. So, the question is how can I adjust price scale space to make entire values of studies visible? Is there any control available for user apart from chart font size that manages this? Thanks.
|
 AMD [R] Daily #1 2017-08-17 17_54_34.729.png / V - Attached On 2017-08-17 21:55:24 UTC - Size: 95.6 KB - 285 views AMD [R] Daily #1 2017-08-17 18_48_33.761.png / V - Attached On 2017-08-17 22:49:37 UTC - Size: 51.75 KB - 283 views |
| [2017-08-18 02:07:03] |
| |
|
OK we understand. This is how Sierra Chart has always handled the scale width. We will look into this, but we can make no promise about this. Improvements to this might be done within a month or two or it could be a year from now.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-08-18 02:10:04
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: