Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 15:36:37 +0000
Better CTS or CQG
View Count: 1551
| [2017-07-07 14:53:33] |
| User1193154 - Posts: 54 |
|
Hi, now as AMP customer have the CTS datafeed as new choice. Better CTS or CQG ? Regards, Flavia |
| [2017-07-07 15:07:57] |
| |
|
Either one is fine. Here is information about CTS: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/CTS_T4.php Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-07-08 01:12:21] |
| cmet - Posts: 580 |
|
CQG is very stable, however I run their data only and I scratch my head at the DOM every now and again when they show large prints that should have wiped 2 levels of liquidity in ES but price fails to tick higher or lower. I've asked them about this thinking it was spreads and was told by them that spread trades are not included in the feed. So either I'm not seeing true liquidity displayed, they are off market block trades or something else is going on. Similar with time/sales when using same price/time. Total volume prints from Sierra DOM sometimes don't match TAS. Hard to see in fast markets but it's obvious when it's slower. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-07-08 01:12:30
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: