Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 05:38:45 +0000
Incorrect Numbers Bar Calculated Values
View Count: 806
| [2017-02-04 15:09:40] |
| User12089 - Posts: 361 |
|
the Diagonal Positive Delta Sum subgraph of the Numbers Bar Calculated Values study doesn't seem to produce correct results (I guess the same is in effect for the negative counteroart) see annotated example attached lets verify the sum for the circled bar (4509+1559) - (1525+84) = 4459 while the study shows 4764 .... The data feed is SC Data Subscription (real-time and historical) Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-02-04 15:11:01
|
 2-4-2017 3-01-28 PM.bmp - Attached On 2017-02-04 15:07:49 UTC - Size: 5.7 MB - 304 views |
| [2017-02-04 21:38:08] |
| |
|
It is also including the Ask Volume on the lowest price level. We will make sure the documentation explains this. Now whether this is the right or wrong way to do it, we do not know but this is how it is intentionally designed. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-02-04 21:47:32] |
| User12089 - Posts: 361 |
|
hmm an order flow trader like me would expect 4459 and hence not what the current design is doing So you mean you just add to 4459 the ask volume executed in the bottom cell of the number bar and this is how you get 4764 should I have to write my own study to produce what I am referring to is that still the right SC api function to call https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/doc_ACSIL_Members_Variables_And_Arrays.html#scVolumeAtPriceForBars |
| [2017-02-04 22:07:38] |
| |
|
So you mean you just add to 4459 the ask volume executed in the bottom cell of the number bar and this is how you get 4764 We are happy to change this, we just want to know what most people are looking for. Yes this is the correct function: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/doc_ACSIL_Members_Variables_And_Arrays.html#scVolumeAtPriceForBars Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-02-04 22:11:06] |
| User12089 - Posts: 361 |
|
or you can simply implement a binary switch which controls which of the two behaviors described here to use
|
| [2017-02-04 22:29:43] |
| User12089 - Posts: 361 |
|
and re the approach when including the ask volume of the bottom cell - I guess you can compare and if necessary then subtract from it the bid volume of the top cell of the preceding bar ...
|
| [2017-02-05 00:11:37] |
| |
|
We will just do this: or you can simply implement a binary switch which controls which of the two behaviors described here to use
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: