Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:46:19 +0000
Chart Reading off by a few fractions - especially ESU3
View Count: 1479
[2013-08-07 16:18:20] |
User49356 - Posts: 9 |
Dear Support Mate, Every once in a while some of my charts are inaccurate off by a few fractions. They also sometimes freeze and stop updating. Your help would be appreciated. |
[2013-08-07 16:46:42] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
We see you are using Open ECry. You may be exceeding the symbol limit: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=doc/openecry.php#Symbols Also, refer to help topic 4 here: Http://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=doc/helpdetails4.html Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2013-10-21 14:26:04] |
User47068 - Posts: 15 |
I use Open ECry and want to monitor and trade over a dozen symbols (metals, energy, indices). 1. Is there any way at all that I can do that? In other words, are there any other data feed options that would allow me to continue trading through OEC, without giving up on the SC platform? 2. Why is there even a 5 symbol limitation? OEC says the throttling was an SC decision, they provide free live data on all symbols. Something doesn't add up. |
[2013-10-21 14:46:58] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
1. Are you referring to the limit of 5 symbols to receive tick by tick data on from OEC? There are other data feed options. This is one of them: Notice: New Futures Real-Time Data Feed 2. This limitation is from OEC. The throttling is not up to us. Not at all. They do have another data feed which provides much fewer updates, but it is not acceptable for charting. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2013-10-21 18:13:49
|
[2013-10-21 16:36:18] |
User47068 - Posts: 15 |
So, for example, I could pay Barchart (or some other vendor, including you guys starting November) and that would drive the charting etc. on your platform and also keep my trading account at the FCM where I have it (OEC). I'd continue to use your platform to monitor price action and send trades. That would be a way of getting around the OEC 5 symbol symbol limit. Yes? Any potential issues I should be aware of as related to actual live trading? For example, the symbol convention that barchart uses could be slightly different from the OEC convention (I notice OEC has some prefixes attached to its symbols). Or, is that all taken care of at your end via the OEC API or something? |
[2013-10-21 19:13:28] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
Yes this is a correct understanding. Sierra Chart has the ability to handle symbol differences between the different services being used. This is no problem. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2013-10-21 19:24:52] |
User47068 - Posts: 15 |
Brilliant. Thanks much. Looking forward to your data feed.
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: