Support Board
Date/Time: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 02:38:00 +0000
VbP study incomplete
View Count: 960
[2016-02-29 23:00:56] |
User94740 - Posts: 333 |
I have a VbP study with a weekly setting on my tick chart. Two of the profiles look ok, but the one highlighted in both charts I uploaded is incomplete. I tried to adjust settings here and there, but in some cases it got even worse. I hope it is only a settings mistake, because I have the same challenge in other charts as well. Also, I would like to understand why if I should use a prior week for reference I can only see so much and then more as the week progresses? http://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?l=1456786565893.png http://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?l=1456786581152.png thx as always! Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-02-29 23:11:08
|
[2016-03-01 01:52:58] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
What is incomplete with this?: http://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?l=1456786565893.png Be very very specific. We will not spend time on the other question at the moment. Refer to the documentation for the settings you are using. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2016-03-01 08:55:02] |
User94740 - Posts: 333 |
the first attachment 1456786565893 is the correct pic in the highlighted area. The other pic 1456786581152 in the highlighted area should look like the correct one, but there is only a partial or incomplete profile
Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-03-01 08:56:01
|
[2016-03-03 17:33:03] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
Why is this the case?: but there is only a partial or incomplete profile
What is it about the particular data it is referencing and the Study Settings that is causing this? You are in a better position to determine this than us. Carefully examine bar by bar the data to make sure it is correct and then check the Study Settings and refer to the documentation for all of the Study Settings that you have changed. You need to understand our perspective on this. We have a very limited view of what you are doing. We do not have access to your Sierra Chart or know exactly what you are doing and what you are expecting. Also, I would like to understand why if I should use a prior week for reference I can only see so much and then more as the week progresses? Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-03-03 17:34:32
|
[2016-03-07 11:38:02] |
User94740 - Posts: 333 |
I understand you are busy and apparently the screen shots fail to purvey the situation. I understand now though the study just has its limitations based upon chart limitations. thank you as always.
|
[2016-03-07 17:37:46] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
Yes. Refer to the documentation here: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/doc_VolumeByPrice.php#BasicVolumeProfileTroubleshootingProcedures Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: