Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 08:09:19 +0000
Post From: cpu comparison
| [2016-04-14 19:26:51] |
| |
|
We tested the Chartbook at post #47. The CPU load was 5%. This is with a 500 millisecond Chart Update Interval. We then set the yearly and monthly TPO profile charts to update at five seconds and the CPU usage went to 0% to 1%. We then set the yearly and monthly TPO profile charts to update at a 500 millisecond interval but set them to Horizontal Bars which is perfectly acceptable with those very dense profiles, the CPU usage went to about 3%. If you do not want to take our advice and use a higher Chart Update Interval on those long-term profiles, then that is your choice but there is no point to continue to ask us about this because we have done all we can at this point. There will be some continued performance improvements but not anything of major significance that would make a difference in your case. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-04-14 19:36:00
|