Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 23:06:23 +0000
Post From: cpu comparison
| [2016-04-10 00:13:00] |
| |
|
not a system issue, and quite POSSIBLY a code issue.
We do not agree based on our testing and our experience, and we have made performance improvements. We do acknowledge that there previously was an inefficiency related to automatic scaling but that has been solved. And in our testing we did not notice CPU usage nearly what they were showing.All of this is really beside the point now because we have made performance improvements by cutting CPU usage by at least 50 percent and created drawing style which is extremely efficient and should cut down the CPU usage by about 90 percent. This is an example of what we are testing: http://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?Image=1460247149839.png Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-04-10 00:26:14
|