Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 23:23:05 +0000
Post From: cpu comparison
| [2016-04-09 22:31:25] |
| |
|
Regarding the issue described in post #12 and our response in post #13, we decided to do our own test. Using CL futures, a TPO block size of .01, TPO blocks drawing style, and many TPO profiles on the chart, we ran a high-speed replay at 960 times and the CPU usage was about consistently 2%. During a replay there is a dramatically much faster rate of updating of the chart window than real-time updating. Therefore, we saw absolutely nowhere near the CPU usage you are showing in post #1. We then updated to 1393 and the CPU usage went to zero percent with the same high-speed replay. Therefore, apparently your system does not have good graphics performance. The system uses an Intel HD Graphics 4600 graphics adapter and the corresponding Intel driver. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-04-09 22:35:23
|