Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 00:44:39 +0000
Post From: non-CLR version: Performance issues only when using spreadsheet studies?
| [2014-08-21 05:40:36] |
| |
|
The performance issues we have seen only apply to spreadsheets which are part of the non-CLR version and they only apply to certain kinds of formulas. The testing of spreadsheets using some simple formulas in the non-CLR version has shown to be much faster than the CLR version. In other areas overall the non-CLR version is faster than the CLR version. We are still figuring out how to do performance testing of the spreadsheet you have given. And we have not had much time to spend on your spreadsheet. And in the end we will not use it for performance testing because it is far too complicated, but analyze it and to determine an appropriate structured test that we can use for performance testing. So even developing a test and determining where we can improve performance requires extensive work. We also will not make any reference to the CLR version because it is not a reliable benchmark. But instead have a fresh look at everything and make performance improvements where we can. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |