Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:44:07 +0000
Post From: Performance on Apple Silicon vs x86 VM
| [2024-08-03 21:42:48] |
| seandunaway - Posts: 268 |
|
i have a different experience after extensive testing. i've been running sierra from mac for years and from arm since m1 i find wine's (devel and crossover) performance unacceptable and specifically wine's networking stack seems broken with sierra on macos. the newer linux compatibility setting doesn't help. wine does not support arm64 binaries and every wine instance is rosetta2'd windows 11 also has it's own x64 to arm64 binary translation like rosetta2, so it can run both. the translated executable must be one-time cached because i can't tell any performance differences. i do however prefer to run the arm64 binaries sierrachart arm64 on windows 11 iot arm64 via parallels is an absolute pleasure. i like that it's running native without the wine setsockopt or file compression errors. it is somehow more performant than my last xps 17 and allows me to run on battery literally four times as long. make sure you enable opengl i wrote a little bit more about it here: Sierra Chart Executables for ARM 64 Processor @gtaranti, you might like: cross compile from macos targeting both aarch64 and x86_64 @michaelpptf, will you please verify you're not trying to write to file across a network or virtualization boundary? it's better to write into the guest filesystem i haven't tried whisky yet, are they using a variant of wine that is improved over crossover or the development branch? Date Time Of Last Edit: 2024-08-03 22:35:47
|