Support Board
Date/Time: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:39:19 +0000
Post From: Sub-instance vs standalone folder installation
| [2024-02-15 22:06:42] |
| Rui S - Posts: 190 |
|
joshtrader, Thank you for your detailed description. After running scenarios for the first hour of trading today, my conclusions follow.
I feel very similar as you describe. I trade just the first 30 minutes after the open and also the volatile releasings. So, like you, I need fluidity too. My big advantage is that I only trade NQ, so I have just one instrument in my primary and secondary instances. Just for charting, I have a third connection with one primary instance and three sub-instances through DTC. I am considering three instances of Sierra: (1) Denali only, for charts; (2) Rithmic for my main ES DOM; (3) secondary login for Rithmic (extra $ per month) for YM and NQ DOMs. This spreads out the processing over 3 instances and will likely give the best result.
I believe you will be better this way. A suggestion though: before paying for an extra Rithmic connection, you could try one of the three Denali allowed connections just for one of the DOMs. Hopefully you will find the best solution for what you need. If you feel like it, please post here the outcome of your future tests. It's always good to know what are the best available options. Regards :) Date Time Of Last Edit: 2024-02-15 22:07:00
|