Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:31:29 +0000
Post From: Sierra Chart Jobs: C++ Programming | Hardware Systems Admin | Web Services Dev | Documentation
| [2024-01-27 21:55:27] |
| Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 17178 |
|
Somehow in the programming community at some point in the past there was someone or a group of developers who was using improper variable and function and class names at some point in the past with the identifiers foo and bar. Probably for the purpose of an example or something like that. We do not know the origin of that. These are stupid idiotic names. And then you have, this trend continuing. Programmers then following and honor this kind of nonsense, idiocy and stupidity. This is just simply plain dumb. And it actually signals, to us, someone who is not confident. And feels they have to associate themselves with what they think is right. It is nothing more than plain stupidity. Here is such an example: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7843866/achieving-clean-lambda-functions-in-c11 More information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foobar Why this stupidity continues is not known to us. And furthermore, Sierra Chart, has a requirement that lamda functions are not used. These make no sense. Functions should only follow a standard syntax. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2024-01-27 21:58:45
|