Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:21:30 +0000
Post From: DOM totals
| [2023-11-07 18:06:35] |
| User357195 - Posts: 123 |
|
I tested the ES, NQ, CL and GC even with the Market Depth Historical Graph study and I could notice no difference in my order fills. I did remove the Market Depth Historical Graph study from my charts. No need to take up resources if the info is not used. One thing.... if I have the market depth data set to 10 levels on a chart, and if there are only 9 levels either on the bid or the ask, then the software is not displaying the total of the 10 levels. It just goes blank instead of counting the total number of 10, as set in this instance. However, it should then just calculate and display the total and assume the 10th level above the inside market is 0 or NULL. For example, if the ask sizes are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 then the software will display a blank instead of the total, in this example, a total of 45 would be the correct total ask size to display. Instead, it waits for the tenth level to display, and assuming 10 in this example is the ask size of the 10th level, then the total ask size is and should be correctly displayed as 55. The best way to see this is with a slow moving time of day on the GC or CL contracts. I hope that makes sense. Is there a setting to correct the above? Sierra Charts are the best, in my opinion. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2023-11-07 18:19:15
|