Support Board
Date/Time: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:30:13 +0000
Post From: 'Invert Chart' function for Historical Charts - Bug
| [2023-03-28 12:37:21] |
| User34124 - Posts: 276 |
|
To address 1) and 2), from 2021: Invert chart function, wicks on the lower side Here John states "There were some changes awhile ago to help with the issue you are seeing," Now, as you can check in 30 seconds, as soon as you change from 1-tick to any other data storage type, there is a difference in one side of the wicks. As addressed in the screenshot in the original post. The mere fact there is a difference is enough to prove the mathematical inconsistency. The mere visual in the screenshot, and the admission from your staff, once again, is concrete information. It doesn't even need to be evidence. This is the most clean, objective information one needs. Bug/Issue found with Chart Drawing Copying and Inverted Charts In this thread from 2020, you stated "Update Sierra Chart to the latest release, 2068. We have implemented a solution." Unfortunately this did not work. *** Regarding 'Multiple Bars By -1' .. I would LOVE to use this. This, for inverting charts, is far superior. Could you simply fix the 'Chart Copy Drawings' to work on these type of inverted charts? So we don't need to get bogged down with the above issue again? I brought this up in 2019, post 7, to which you said you needed time to think about this. 11 days later you overtly dismissed it. So, if you can just accept the logical consistency that chart object behaviour should be normal and reflective of a simple divisor when applying the 'Multiple Bars' study, all of these issues can be fixed permenantly. Which style of 'Inverted' chart to use to copy drawings accross chartbooks? |