Support Board
Date/Time: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:36:40 +0000
Post From: CQG user experience - from an IT Pro
| [2021-12-22 15:06:31] |
| |
|
the above statements / model description completely misses the Broker (e.g. AMP Futures) in the overall Technical and Market Structure Model described No it does not. There would still be a broker. It is just that all of the order management, is with the exchange and not any intermediary. And the broker then accesses, the interfaces for that from the exchange. No different than when they use Firm Soft with the CME. Instead the orders are now going direct to the exchange and the exchange handles the risk management. Or the risk management can be done externally. Either way. It can be a choice. There simply is no need for any intermediary. And yes we understand that a system from a trading technology provider can bring multiple exchanges together under a single account, but this really adds a huge complexity, and reliability issues . Although each exchange should always really be a different account and in many cases is. The broker can just simply offer a way to move funds between accounts easily. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-12-22 15:34:48
|