Support Board
Date/Time: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:07:07 +0000
Post From: Linux
| [2021-01-29 03:36:17] |
| ertrader - Posts: 672 |
|
Hi Jezz... I'm using default NVidia graphics settings with my GTX....nothing special. I do use OpenGL without any issues and have also used SC non-OpenGL settings with no issues. OpenGL "seems" to have better performance but frankly I'm unable to detect the difference. At one point, CPU usage was significantly less with OpenGL but I have not seen this difference for many months. I run 2 SC's at the same time and each is 3 percent CPU usage with 250-450 MiB of ram... that's MiB...frankly cannot believe it all runs with such little memory. Wineserver takes another 3 percent CPU. It would be good to have some GPU performance results, however, with such good performance (loading, screen refreshes etc.), have not seen the need. My chartbooks with 6 charts per chartbook (One chartbook for each instrument: ES, NQ, RTY and GC) load in less than 2 seconds per chartbook. Sometimes data loading takes a second or two longer. I do have another chartbook with 15 charts and it takes about 3 seconds. So, for all charts (39 charts) takes about 11 seconds. Edit: Updated to 2225 memory usage now at 600 to 800 MiB. Will monitor. Still low but interesting increase. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-01-30 01:44:08
|