Support Board
Date/Time: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 15:50:50 +0000
Post From: Linux
| [2020-06-24 13:37:55] |
| Ackin - Posts: 1865 |
|
BeardPower) it's the kick for me ... User212764 suffers from some need to constantly spam this forum with attacks on me. Because he is unable to build his own ACSIL program from a large number of materials in the documentation and needs the source code for copypaste programming ... He does not understand at all that I lost thousands of hours at the computer and just that it's free = is too .... 600 registered people on my forum can confirm that I didn't want a single dollar for the free1 library for anyone there for the 200 studies that Sierra refused to create. What is constantly writes about source codes here by that user is already taken in my country as an attempt at blackmail and bullying in the network. I have no obligation to provide the source code of my work to anyone. And as you write correctly, Sierra doesn't do it either. If someone does not trust the product, they do not have to download it. He is not forced to do so. I don't understand this constant crying and constant confusion between "open source" and "free app" (free of charge without open source code). I only provide .dll file ...compiled library....without source code and everyone knows it in advance. Read this thread and make your own opinion: Easy Language Convert User106072) That is a great truth... Open source matters if everyone develops the code and returns the results. Sierra provides source code for its studies. Then come third-party programmers who don't get much out of these studies in practice ... documentation is used rather than source files in ACS. And here's the turning point. For example, if I return the finished source code, who will further develop it here? I shared my codes here in the beginning and do you know what the response was? None ..... just download and goodbye I apologize to the author of the thread for offtopic Date Time Of Last Edit: 2020-06-24 16:47:08
|