Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 07:11:08 +0000
Post From: Sierra Chart's flaw with Eurex data solution
| [2019-12-01 13:06:20] |
| BenjFlame - Posts: 324 |
|
Thanks for the details.... even if there is still no good solution on the horizon, it's always interesting to know what goes under the hood and this direct access to engineering is a part of what makes Sierra unique. The data feed you are using now, is provided in cooperation with Barchart. We are quite restricted with what we can do. This is why we have created the new Denali data feed, where we are free to do a lot more.
This requires clarification. I'm subscribed to the more expensive Sierra Chart real time feed. I do need Stocks and Eurex feed indeed, but I was thinking that for CME, it was your top feed. From your message it seems to imply that the CME Daneli feed is not the same as the one I use (whici comes in fact from barchart) and that with Daneli you are "free to do a lot more". Can you please elaborate the difference between CME feed from the Sierra Chart real time Daneli? I want your best feed and if Daneli is better (and less expensive) I might as well use Sierra only for CME and another solution for Eurex / Stocks. Also have you had a look at CQG? When you connect to CQG from Europe, you will go through a CQG server in Europe. We think London. But how the data is routed, ultimately we do not know.
This is really confusing, I read so many bad things from you about CQG/Sierra, that to be honest, I didn't even considered it and went straight to your own feed. TT44: it seems that if selecting the TT Frankfurt gateway, the orders are accepted on the exchange in <40ms which means the order routing isn't going via the USA.
How are you able to determine that ms delay? I have no experience with TT setup. Also please keep us informed if you get an answer from EUREX. Also what are you using for your Eurex data? Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-12-01 13:17:45
|