Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 19:59:27 +0000
Post From: [Scale in with independant subsequent attached orders] Possible through configuration?
| [2019-09-23 05:49:10] |
| owneroxxor - Posts: 16 |
|
Hi there SC Team. I'm currently developing an ACSIL backtester to test on B3 Exchange futures. Since I use a NET account on B3, it is a must for me to have the "Scale in" option turned on, the same goes to "Scale out". With that, I use theoretical average price as well. Everything goes fine until I realise something that broke my whole ACSIL bot strategy concept. Happens that (I don't know your reasons why this was constructed tied this way) but the "Scale in" option doesn't let subsequent orders have their own individual target attached orders, all the subsequent target attached orders are placed together with the first attached order of the position. Is it possible to make them independant via configuration even with "Scale in" turned on? (I just use Scale in to simulate the NET account, never wanted it to control the behavior of my subsequent attached orders on the position). My strategy really depends on this. If it isn't possible to do via configuration nowdays, could there be an option on a next version to make us choose if we want "Scale in" to control the subsequent attached orders or not? Thanks in advance |