Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 17:44:40 +0000
Post From: Zig Zag Alerts
| [2019-09-14 21:30:19] |
| Chris_uk - Posts: 89 |
|
Hi Tom, Many Thanks for taking the time to reply, apologies for the delay in responding. I will post these settings soon. I do not understand why the study needs to repaint values from the prior legs for the duration of the 'new leg' development. Surely between a new leg starting and a new leg completing, prior legs values should remain unchanged? In this case the leg[-2] values are reverting back to values from leg[-3] Is this kind of a behaviour a necessity from a technical standpoint, do you know? Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-09-14 21:33:19
|