Support Board
Date/Time: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 20:26:58 +0000
Post From: Discrepancy with CQG
| [2019-01-27 22:41:43] |
| |
|
It sounds like the difference is with the underlying data, not with the Stochastic study itself. Use the Stochastic-Slow study on 1 minute bars and then compare that to what you have in CQG. Certainly some difference can be expected but it would be minimal. If essentially it is the same, then the difference is with the underlying bars. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |