Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 18:27:53 +0000
Post From: Efficiency question
[2018-02-09 10:11:35] |
User132748 - Posts: 159 |
Yes I know Sierra is fast end efficient platform and I know chart interval setting but i wanted to know if such load balancing setup (first instance as data processer and second as chart interface) is better setup by default or it will only add extra lag? Im aware that there is a sweet spot in setting chart interval where setting it too small will have an opposite effect where CPU would refresh the chart constantly having no time for processing new data from datafeed. But thats the reason I tought it would be a good idea to split these tasks. My problem is Im experiencing loosing live bid/ask depth data (in comparison with my friend's charts using same datafeed what can be seen for example on BidAsk Depth Bars study, where he has quite fluent candle changes and I have many big candle spikes and our depth levels are different in many spots). |