Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 17:04:03 +0000
Trade Activity Log - Statistics - Merged trades
View Count: 77
[2025-01-15 15:47:19] |
User113810 - Posts: 8 |
Morning I use bracket orders and I believe this impacts the Statistics section in the Trade Activity Log Showing an example trade is likely the best way to ask my question: Entry (Sell) orders are executed the same time (using brackets) for these fills Sld 2 NQH5 21261.75 Sld 1 NQH5 21261.75 Sld 1 NQH5 21261.75 Exit (Buy) orders are executed at different times for these fills Bot 2 NQH5 21241.75 Bot 1 NQH5 21231.75 Bot 1 NQH5 21211.75 Average prices on trade and MERGED trade Sell 4 NQH5 21261.75 Buy 4 NQH5 21231.75 "Trades" tab allows for flat-to-flat option via the Edit menu "Trade Activity" tab does not (just as a check) What I desire is for the STATISTICS section to use Flat-to-Flat trades so the (great) data in that tab is not being calculated usinf each each leg of the bracket orders. At a basic level, rather than ONE trade, the Statistics believes this is THREE trades. Do you think this is possible? Apologies for the lengthy explanation / query |
[2025-01-15 18:10:25] |
John - SC Support - Posts: 37753 |
The Statistics tab has a number of entries for "Flat to Flat" statistics. What exactly are you looking for that is not already in there?
For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2025-01-15 19:54:48] |
User113810 - Posts: 8 |
Agreed and I must acknowledge that I missed some of the flat-to-flat rows. I had downloaded all trade data to look at time-between and time-in trades as potential enhancement after reviewing some of the time related fields in Statistics. Average Time(s), Longest Held and the Consecutive Winners/Losers were my focus and I neglected to highlight in my intial query. Clearly there would be some minor assumptions made for those sections to have flat-to-flat data. I can appreciate this type of enhancement or change is "edge case" and the assumptions are likely not worth the effort to change? |
[2025-01-16 02:54:15] |
Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 18285 |
It is very unlikely any additional work like this will be done. Too many other priorities.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: