Support Board
Date/Time: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 04:57:21 +0000
[User Discussion] - Change in Point And Figure chart when adding Number bar study
View Count: 857
| [2019-10-25 16:28:08] |
| BenjFlame - Posts: 335 |
|
Please look at those images that display: 1) A correct point and figure chart 2) The same point and figure chart with a number bar study added in top of it. You can see on the chart with number bar stody, as pointed with the red arrow on left of image, that on this column switch case, the columns don't aligns properly as PF should, and an additional empty tick level is added at start of next column, so the PF chart with study is not the same. It is as if it misses 1 round level. Why is that? I would have expected exact same price distribution of chart with and without number study. Please advice on how to solve this. (this is a 1 box tick, 3 ticks reversal chart of ES) Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-10-25 16:33:17
|
 pointandfigureok.JPG / V - Attached On 2019-10-25 16:26:38 UTC - Size: 107.68 KB - 375 views pointandfigurebad.JPG / V - Attached On 2019-10-25 16:26:43 UTC - Size: 146.6 KB - 367 views |
| [2019-10-25 21:24:18] |
| |
|
What you see is absolutely correct. The Numbers Bars study is showing the actual traded price levels per bar. Look at using Reversal Bars instead: Chart Settings: Intraday Chart Bar Period >> Bar Period Type >> Reversal Bar (in ticks) (ReversalAmount - MinimumLength) Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: