Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 12:49:35 +0000
Tick Size vs Volume at Price Multiplier aggregation method is different
View Count: 1507
[2019-07-04 11:05:36] |
binaryduke - Posts: 377 |
Referring to this link: Numbers Bars: Adjusting Tick Size For Larger Increment The volume aggregated by tick size changes aggregates across a different range to the Volume at Price Multiplier. Image 1 - 'control' is CL chosen for a clean 0.01 tick. The Numbers Bars are displaying Ask Volume - Bid Volume at each price level. We need only concern ourselves with the final bar in the chart. Image 2 - 'ticksize' shows that when adjusting the tick size from 0.01 to 0.1, volume is aggregated from n.6 below the new tick to n.5 above the new tick, i.e. 57.10 is aggregating 57.06 to 57.15; 57.20 is aggregating 57.16 to 57.25, etc. Image 3 - 'VAP multiplier' shows that the Volume at Price Multiplier is aggregating from n.5 below to n.4 above (i.e. 57.10 is calculating 57.05 to 57.14; 57.20 is calculating 57.15 to 57.24 Is this intentional and if not, if & when the calculation changes would it affect tick size or VAP multiplier aggregation? Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-07-04 11:06:07
|
1-control.png / V - Attached On 2019-07-04 10:59:28 UTC - Size: 64.18 KB - 374 views 2-ticksize.png / V - Attached On 2019-07-04 10:59:34 UTC - Size: 41.95 KB - 370 views 3-VAP multiplier.png / V - Attached On 2019-07-04 10:59:40 UTC - Size: 42.41 KB - 370 views |
[2019-07-10 22:58:03] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
We need time to get to this.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: