Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 10:32:03 +0000
Omptimus, Amp and Rithmic
View Count: 1298
| [2017-05-03 12:24:58] |
| grantx - Posts: 244 |
|
Whats your view on using Optimus with AMP and Rithmic or CQG? I get so many conflicting opinions that I would like to ask you, since you would know what the best setup is with your platform. |
| [2017-05-03 15:18:17] |
| |
|
We recommend using CQG.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-06-09 22:11:34] |
| User521791 - Posts: 12 |
|
Hello can you explain why you recommend CQG over Rithmic?
|
| [2017-06-09 22:15:29] |
| |
|
When there are connectivity problems, it is much easier to understand what the problem is with CQG compared to Rithmic. There is also not a separate process involved with connecting to Rithmic which is necessary because it uses an API component. More about that is here: Sierra Chart Does not Support External Service API Components So re-connections to CQG are much faster than Rithmic. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-06-09 22:16:28
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: