Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 22:50:47 +0000
Bracket orders and OCO
View Count: 882
| [2017-01-04 10:12:18] |
| User61993 - Posts: 9 |
|
I want to use SC, SC real-time datafeed and AMP broker service. I would like to know where bracket orders and OCO are hold.
|
| [2017-01-04 10:27:36] |
| |
|
Assuming you will be using CQG, these can be held on the server. Refer to: Attached Orders Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-01-04 11:02:58] |
| User61993 - Posts: 9 |
|
Is CQG datafeed same quality as SC datafeed?
|
| [2017-01-04 11:39:35] |
| |
|
Yes overall you should find it acceptable. You will need to make the final judgment. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-01-05 19:57:09] |
| User61993 - Posts: 9 |
|
I probably should have specified it, i'm interested into Ask x Bid Volume quality of CQG datafeed. For numbers bar using. Is CQG worse or same AskxBid volume quality as SC datafeed? Thank you for your responses.
Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-01-05 20:03:36
|
| [2017-01-05 20:57:08] |
| |
|
The accuracy of Bid Volume and Ask Volume when using the CQG data feed is going to be less. So you are best off using the Sierra Chart Exchange Data Feed. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-01-06 11:24:06] |
| User61993 - Posts: 9 |
|
What about Rithmic datafeed using for numbers bars? Rithmic doesn't include historical tick by tick AskxBid volume data, but with SC, historical data are provided by SC. Together it makes continuous tick by tick AskxBid graph. Am I right?
|
| [2017-01-06 17:31:15] |
| |
|
We really do not prefer Rithmic. But the Bid Volume and Ask volume will be accurate with Rithmic and tick by tick data is provided. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-01-06 17:34:49
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: