Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:37:10 +0000
VOLUME PROFILE POC not extend
View Count: 2865
[2015-04-14 08:13:34] |
JingIt - Posts: 44 |
I use TPO + volume profile, volume profile extend point of control setting has been adjust to until future intersection but VOLUME PROFILE POC not extend in chart. How can I fix this?? Also, I set volume bar width type is window width but it doesn't work when use with TPO profile, the width of profile only change when I change setting in TPO profile (percentage width for volume profile). Can Sierrachart team fix this issue so I can set the fix window with for volume profile (not percentage in TPO setting) when using with TPO profile parallelly. Thank you |
VP_poc_not_extend.png / V - Attached On 2015-04-14 08:06:01 UTC - Size: 107.21 KB - 492 views |
[2015-04-14 17:32:21] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
I use TPO + volume profile, volume profile extend point of control setting has been adjust to until future intersection but VOLUME PROFILE POC not extend in chart. This is not currently supported, but it will be added.Can Sierrachart team fix this issue so I can set the fix window with for volume profile (not percentage in TPO setting) when using with TPO profile parallelly. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2015-04-14 17:32:45
|
[2015-04-15 11:47:03] |
JingIt - Posts: 44 |
No. This is by design. You need to understand that TPO Profile Charts are special type of charts with special spacing requirements.
Is there another solution to make it happen? I know another chart vendor can do it and I don't want to mention their name here, so I believe there will have a solution if Sierra Engineering team really want it to happen. The reason I request this feature because the volume profile is useless when the session is just started in first 1 to 2 hour while TPO chart building the 1st & 2nd bracket. |
[2015-04-15 19:10:18] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
OK now we understand the nature the problem. We will see how to solve this.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2015-04-28 23:56:01] |
JingIt - Posts: 44 |
Thanks SC team, I saw the update on volume profile width has been updated. May I ask when the volume profile poc extension issue will be updated? Also any update on single feature request in this topic? Single is extremely important when using market profile, I really hope this feature can be added very soon in SC Feature Request: Singles for TPO Charts |
2015-04-29_0951.png / V - Attached On 2015-04-28 23:55:00 UTC - Size: 114.6 KB - 492 views |
[2015-04-29 04:50:12] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
May I ask when the volume profile poc extension issue will be updated? We will try to do this as soon as we can but we are not sure when.We do not know about TPO Singles identification. That is quite involved. It will be sometime before we can get to it. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2015-04-29 08:13:44] |
JingIt - Posts: 44 |
I hope this document can help SC team through TPO Single identification process easier. In Market Profile charts, "singles" refer to prices within profiles which only contain a single TPO/letter but which are surrounded (above and below) by prices with at least two TPOs. If you look at the market profile chart to the right (attached file), notice that singles were created in the N period, as those singles have double TPOs both above and below them. However, if you look at the P at extreme low of the profile, that is not considered a single because there are no prices below it which contain 2 or more TPOs.
Given this definition of "singles", when singles are taken out (when the current price moves to touch a single from a previous profile that had not currently been touched since it's creation), then it is theorized that price will commonly continue to the extreme price of the profile in which the single was created. Therefore, singles are labelled with the extreme price of the profile in which the single was created. That extreme price will be the high price of the profile if the single was made on the way down, and the low of the profile if single was made on the way up. Notice in the chart to the right (attached file), that singles were created on the way down in the N period. While there are technically 5 single prices, the highest single made on the way down is the key single. If singles are created on the way up, the lowest key single is the one with the lowest price. And since this single is made on the way down, it is labelled with the high price of the profile (which happens to be 779.00). It is believed that if price returns to 760.00 during a subsequent profile ("takes out" the single), then price will continue to the high (779.00) of the profile in which it was created. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2015-04-29 08:15:47
|
2015-04-29_1815.png / V - Attached On 2015-04-29 08:15:42 UTC - Size: 9.35 KB - 441 views |
[2016-05-16 14:46:31] |
Zosimus - Posts: 345 |
Any news regarding extending (Until future intersection) the VPOCs of the Volume Profiles on TPO charts ?
|
[2016-05-17 05:33:43] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
We will try to get to this in the next two weeks.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
[2016-05-24 05:33:24] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
To be released in 1417: When using the Volume by Price study with the TPO Profile Chart study, all of the extension options for the Point of Control and Value Area are now supported with optional labels and they are all based upon volume profile calculations rather than TPOs.
We apologize for the long wait. We know this has been years over due. We are working hard to catch up on a lot of overdue development. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: