Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 08:32:03 +0000
Post From: Feedback Requested: Trading Evaluators (Top Step Trader etc.)
| [2020-01-25 12:12:00] |
| |
|
but for the sake of argument, sure, let's say these funding companies make an exception for Sierrachart users and use the SierraChart Simulator service instead of Rithmic for the evaluation component.
Based on our experience, we do think that this would be possible especially if we have a large community of users using those services listed above or are interested in them.The Rithmic bridge program affects both market data and trading. (1) Sierrachart somehow convinces all of these funding companies to adopt TT order routing for funded Sierrachart users, OR This we are not sure about. But we do think that we can develop competitive technology to meet their requirements. Rithmic may be dominant now among them, but certainly competition is needed and Rithmic will not always remain dominant. One thing we would say with absolute 100% certainty, is we are not going to be investing any further time with Rithmic. It is just not going to happen. There is 0% chance that is going to happen. And we mean 0% chance. And the basis of this is CME market data policy. Why would we want to be supporting and enslaved to yet another service for CME market data. It makes no sense when we already have our own high-quality services. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2020-01-26 02:07:43
|